Yup, as do other theories. The most talked about possibility (after human error) is that we've finally detected other dimensions. Makes for some intriguing possibilities, however also seems similar to superconductivity at room temperature or superfluidity at room temp - both of those seem to at least bends the normal rules as we know them. And then we've never found the quantum mechanics boundary we just sort of know where it usually is.
To be clear though, relativity will not, nor will it ever, be "destroyed" as a theory. It works and is fact. What could happen is that it will be superseded by a new theory that both includes relativity and some new set of environmental variables that have as of yet to be defined. On Sep 23, 2011, at 2:59 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > Doesn't M-theory already posit that the normal rules of thermodynamics don't > necessarily apply at the subatomic level? Thought i remembered reading that > in Hawking's book...which means that this "discovery" wouldn't be all that > shocking. > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> So what's going to be the new theory to govern nano particles? :-) >> >> And ....does this mean that anything larger could travel faster than the >> speed of light? Would we need to automagically shrink ourselves to a point >> spec before teleporting ourselves faster than light speed to the nearest M >> class planet? :-) >> >> FUN FUN!! >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:342992 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
