I rather liked the gps explanation. It seemed quire reasonable. On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > didn't see it, but I am sure this did not get the same coverage as the > original conclusion. Certainly seems to meet the requirements of > Occam's razor, though. > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:32 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> "The science is not settled, not by a long shot. Last month, >>> scientists at CERN, the prestigious high-energy physics lab in >>> Switzerland, reported that neutrinos mightç¾epeat, mightèravel faster >>> than the speed of light. If serious scientists can question Einstein's >>> theory of relativity, then there must be room for debate about the >>> workings and complexities of the Earth's atmosphere." >>> >> >> Not to pick and choose from your article but....did anyone see the follow up >> to this a few days ago? Apparently they had their clocks synced wrong.... >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:343505 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
