I was listening to a defense analyst on the way home last night. One of the things he mentioned is that the drones used in that area are not the most advanced, so that it was considered an acceptable risk to lose one or two. As this guy said, it was not a matter of if but when a drone was lost.
Of course it could be part of a very perverse idea - "lose" as drone with tech that's not only old, but containing some other features that may sabotage the iranian efforts. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seriously? They cheaped out on self-destruct without considering the > cost of defending against the drones if the tech fell into empty > hands? Just how stupid are they? > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Scott Raley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No not all have self destruct. Some just have code to wipe the storage >> drive. The one on tv is similar to the one I helped with last year and there >> was "no money for self destruct" and that would "cause extra weight load". >> But I didn't say that. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:344437 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
