Why should there be a distinction. What do those comments have to do with his medical practice? They sound like political comments to me. If you allow something to be published under your name, regardless if you wrote it or not...it is your baby and you are fullyt responsible for it. Ask any editor at a magazine or a newspaper what would happen if an article that was bad got out under their watch and they are just editors...
-----Original Message----- From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 11:34 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Interesting article on Ron Pauls newsletters On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > Big picture time. Ron Paul is not a racist, but racist material came > out under his watch, under his name. He says he didn't write it and I > believe him, but he hadn't the managerial oversight to make sure > others weren't publishing heinous material under his aegis. He was not in political office when this crap came out and was focused on his medical practice. Doesn't totally excuse it, but it's an important distinction to make. -Cameron ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:344967 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
