Yet he was one of the chief sponsors of the Defense of Marriage Act. And he's been trying to get even more restrictions in place. Recently he sponsored the Marriage Protection Act which would forbid the courts from hearing any cases challenging the DOMA or MPA.
So how is this stating that the "govt shouldnt be involved in deciding who can/cant be married." Rather it seems to be the opposite. As I said THOMAS is very useful in this regard. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Ras Tafari <[email protected]> wrote: > > ron paul said that the govt shouldnt be involved in deciding who > can/cant be married. > > its not their business. > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Not sure how a politician who is opposed to same sex marriage, and a >> wide variety of other civil liberty issues, could claim to be staying >> out of our personal lives. >> >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Tony <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> it's a step in the right direction, as the fed govt should stay out of our >>> personal lives. >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 4, 2012, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> To me, Ron Paul is nto different than any other GOP candidate with the >>>> exception that he hides all his homophobia and religion behind the >>>> shield of 'state's rights'. Makes me sad, too. I really liked him. >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345076 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
