Ha. They remove one provision and want to call it narrowly tailored? I don't think so. That bill was astonishing in the number of ways it was a bad idea, even starting from extreme cynicism. Have they removed the monitoring all customers requirement? I doubt it? The streaming as felony provisions? Unlikely.
This is sleight of hand. They have everyone worked up over SOPA, then they are going to fix it, oh, look, they passed the *Senate* version, which is only moderately horrifying (in comparison). People keep saying nah, YouTube isn't going anywhere, but it totally is if either of these bills pass. Even Google can only fight this stuff for so long. On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>wrote: > > It appears that people in these organizations may be getting worried. > > http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71534.html > > MPAA, Chamber strike conciliatory note on piracy bills > By: Tony Romm > January 17, 2012 11:05 AM EST > > Backing down from bullish support of efforts to block access to rogue > sites peddling stolen movies and music, two industry leaders at the > State of the Net conference Tuesday urged Congress to continue work on > copyright legislation. > > Paul Brigner, senior vice president and chief technology policy > officer with the Motion Picture Association of America, began the > session with a conciliatory note, acknowledging that so-called DNS > blocking is "off the table" in the debate over the Stop Online Piracy > Act in the House and PROTECT IP Act in the Senate. > > In fact, Brigner even stressed the movie studios' lobby has a > "commitment to technologies" that undergird the structure of the > Internet though he did stress any bill to emerge from Congress must > have teeth that would actually disrupt foreign rogue websites. > > "Despite all of my best efforts, the past year has been dominated by > really a bitter war between Silicon Valley and the content industry," > Brigner said. "And its a shame, because a lot of it has been fueled, > I think, by misinformation and exaggeration about what the MPAA and > others were trying to accomplish with this legislation." > > "We need more than just following the money, and addressing the search > results," he later added. "There needs to be some indication that when > you try to go to these rogue sites, you shouldn't be there." > > That was a similar tone sounded by Steve Tepp, chief intellectual > property counsel with the Global Intellectual Property Center, an arm > of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which also supports the online piracy > legislation. > > Tepp noted that industry is now "at a place where a provision that has > generated the most consternation, the most uproar" has been removed > from SOPA and PIPA. "And what we're left with is a very narrow, > carefully tailored, narrowly targeted bill that addresses the worst of > the worst online thieves, whether it's the Senate or the House bill." > > Tepp said he expected further tweaks as the House and Senate continue > their respective processes. But, he said with respect to the > challenges his industry faces in combating IP infringement, "In order > to slay this dragon, we need more than a fly swatter." > > This article first appeared on POLITICO Pro at 11:03 a.m. on January 17, > 2012. > > -- > There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always > has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant > thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, > nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance > is just as good as your knowledge." - Issac Asim > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345419 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
