On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> No, the money has not been spent.  That's just another opposition lie.

Yeah, it's gone. In the lockbox so to say.

The stimulus failed to stimulate, it was a colossal waste of money but
Obama knew it wouldn't work:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/340286c8-4615-11e1-9592-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz1kVH4f3pe

Senior economic advisers to Barack Obama, the then US president-elect,
turned away from a supersized fiscal stimulus because they doubted its
practicality, according to a December 2008 internal memo.

The 57-page memo from Lawrence Summers, then the incoming director of
the economic bureaucracy in the White House, lays out the thinking of
the Obama administration in unprecedented detail. The memo was
obtained by The New Yorker magazine.

Mr Summers told the president that it would be hard to spend more than
$300bn on government investment and anything above that would have to
come from transfers to the states and tax cuts. He also said that a
giant stimulus of more than $1,000bn aimed at rapidly reducing the
unemployment rate “would likely not accomplish the goal because of the
impact it would have on markets”.

The memo sheds new light on a long-running controversy about whether
the 2009 stimulus – which became the $787bn American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act – failed to keep unemployment below 9 per cent
because it was too small. It suggests that Mr Obama’s economic
advisers recognised that the economy needed a bigger boost, but did
not think they could design one and feared a backlash from bond
markets.

“While the most effective stimulus is government investment, it is
difficult to identify feasible spending projects on the scale that is
needed to stabilise the macroeconomy,” Mr Summers wrote. “To get the
package to the requisite size, and also to address other problems, we
recommend combining it with substantial state fiscal relief and tax
cuts for individuals and businesses.”

The memo sets out four stimulus options ranging from $550bn to $890bn
in size. Even based on assumptions about the crisis that turned out to
be optimistic, Mr Summers called for a package “considerably larger”
than $500bn-600bn, but said that “an excessive recovery package could
spook markets or the public and be counterproductive”.

Critics have argued that the decline in 10-year US Treasury yields to
around 2 per cent showed that fears of a shock to the bond markets
were exaggerated.

The memo also shows that Mr Obama’s advisers made a serious political
misjudgment, believing that if they asked for too small a stimulus, it
would be easy to go back to Congress and ask for more. “It is easier
to add down the road to insufficient fiscal stimulus than to subtract
from excessive fiscal stimulus,” the memo notes.

Mr Obama has found it nearly impossible to persuade Congress to
authorise any further stimulus spending.

.



> As for the money being wasted, tell that to all the people who are
> working, those who got the tax refund, and those who are driving on
> the roads and bridges being repaired.  Again, just more opposition
> spi

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345794
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to