http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/report-paul-approved-racist-portions-of-newsletters-112566.html

Report: Paul approved racist portions of newsletters
By EMILY SCHULTHEIS |
1/27/12 12:30 PM EST

The question of Ron Paul's newsletters, and the racially charged
portions of them, made headlines last month as Paul gained momentum in
Iowa.

At the time, Paul denied having knowledge of any of the more
controversial passages -- but now, the Washington Post is reporting
that he did actually sign off on them:

[P]eople close to Paul’s operations said he was deeply involved in the
company that produced the newsletters, Ron Paul & Associates, and
closely monitored its operations, signing off on articles and speaking
to staff members virtually every day.

“It was his newsletter, and it was under his name, so he always got to
see the final product. . . . He would proof it,’’ said Renae Hathway,
a former secretary in Paul’s company and a supporter of the Texas
congressman.

The newsletters point to a rarely seen and somewhat opaque side of
Paul, who has surprised the political community by becoming an
important factor in the Republican race. The candidate, who has
presented himself as a kindly doctor and political truth-teller,
declined in a recent debate to release his tax returns, joking that he
would be “embarrassed” about his income compared with that of his
richer GOP rivals.

Yet a review of his enterprises reveals a sharp-eyed businessman who
for nearly two decades oversaw the company and a nonprofit foundation,
intertwining them with his political career. The newsletters, which
were launched in the mid-1980s and bore such names as the Ron Paul
Survival Report, were produced by a company Paul dissolved in 2001.
...

Jesse Benton, a presidential campaign spokesman, said that the
accounts of Paul’s involvement were untrue and that Paul was
practicing medicine full time when “the offensive material appeared
under his name.” Paul “abhors it, rejects it and has taken
responsibility for it as he should have better policed the work being
done under his masthead,” Benton said. He did not comment on Paul’s
business strategy.

Benton, Paul's spokesman, also denied the Post report in an email to
POLITICO, calling it a "silly goose chase" that distracts from more
important campaign issues.

The Post story "is especially troublesome given the many credible
sources who were happy to go on the record and refute these lies," he
wrote.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:345907
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to