http://gizmodo.com/5880458/think-were-headed-for-a-new-ice-age-youre-wrong

"Sure, the Maunder Minimum itself is widely linked to the Little Ice Age.
Newspapers like the Daily Mail love to claim that this is exactly what's
going to happen again.

The problem with the argument, however, is that the sun failing to put
enough heat out just doesn't make that big an impact on our already-warming
planet. It's one factor among many, and a relatively minor one at
that. According
to New 
Scientist<http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527494.700-a-quiet-sun-wont-save-us-from-global-warming.html>,
in 2010 a team of researcher modelled what would happen if we had a global
temperature minimum starting now, and running to 2100. The result? The
average global temperature would drop by 0.3C at most.

On the other hand, current estimates for temperature increase due to
greenhouse gas emissions are 2-4.5C by 2100. Looking at the two, warming
due to greenhouse gasses wins out. In fact, the two results can happily
superposed, which means we can say that the smallest change in temperature
would then be a 1.7C increase.

This isn't an Ice Age, son. It's just that the heatwave isn't quite as hot
as we expected."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346136
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to