You obviously didn't read the transcript and just want to stir up shit like Rush. So once again, I am going to label you as trolling.
You keep repeating the same stupid statements that were addressed in the testimony. You have no clear argument. you have been all over the place and nothing matches up or ties together. You have run the gamut from "Well, the left does it too!" to "It's no big deal. It's actually kinda funny!" You aren't interested in addressing the actual content of the testimony, which you were bitching about earlier because people were paying more attention to Rush than the facts, and only interested in putting your fingers on autopilot, or just spewing out whatever new fallacy has popped into your head at the time. When someone does try to talk about the facts, you only respond with hyperbole that you actually expect someone to take seriously, if you respond to the subject at all and not resort to a distraction tactic or a statement that makes absolutely no sense and has nothing to do with anything. On 3/4/2012 7:59 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That's cost of contraception, notice. Nothing there about oral >> contraceptives. So an average, across many students, some of whom may get >> injections, implants or IUDs. Maybe some of the implants need to be >> removed on an emergency basis. Other patients may get bleeding episodes >> from the hormones, or some other expensive side effects. It is *not* just >> oral contraceptives, it's cost of contraception, in other words also >> including lab tests, doctor visits, well woman exams.... they don't just >> hand you the pills. > > A doctors visit will cost you a co-pay. Done. If you want the Cadillac > contraception plan than you pay for it or use any of the other > providers in the area that offer it. None issue pretending to be one. > > >> More to the point, focusing on that number is just an attempt to deflect >> the actual meaning of her statement, which is that her friend's insurance >> isn't paying for medical care because they suspect that sex might be >> involved. And that the school does not subsidize this insurance at all. If >> both of those statements are true then the situation is wrong no matter how >> you construe it. > > The insurance plan offered by the school includes contraception for > medical purposes. If they aren't paying that's a totally unrelated > issue and should be dealt with in a different venue. > >> I don't see how you can construe a First Amendment right to dictate health >> care you aren't paying for. > > wa? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347945 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
