On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:21 PM, PT <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3/4/2012 9:11 PM, Sam wrote: >> I did read the transcript and I pointed out repeatedly why none of it >> applies to the hearings. That is why it was not accepted as a valid >> argument. > > Then you didn't understand what you read.
I did. > That's because I don't know what you are talking about half the time and > the other half is you making statements full of so much hyperbole that > there isn't any real foundation for a logical argument. Then you didn't understand what you read. >> I've addressed all the statements in the testimony and will gladly >> address others. > > Not in a sensible way or not without inflammatory coloring. BS >> I thought maybe I could take a discussion with you seriously but I see >> when you see you run out of logic you turn to insults. > > I am not insulting. I am telling you how I see things and how it is > impossible to debate anything with you. There is no logic to run out of > when the entire argument is illogical. You ability to mentally twist > things is astounding though. I do have to give you credit for that. I debate quite well. Problem is when you are set in your decisions before hand and are shown the truth. It seems to frustrate you. Yes you hate Limbaugh and many do. But the outrage you have is over a false issue. It's so bad you can't even argue your point. You haven't made any points, you just asked questions and seemed surprise the answers weren't what you expected. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:347969 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
