OK lets see how bad of a hash I can make of this. A sales tax hits
lower income people far more than those who make more, as a percentage
of income.

10% of a grocery bill of $100 is less of a hit to someone making
$100,000 a year than someone making $20,000.

Its still a hit but a much greater hit for the person making $20,000.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> First, let me say, I am not advocating a 'flat tax' . These are
> legitimate questions (not trolling). I really don't understand (and
> want to)
>
> How would it 'hit the poor far more than any other group'?
>
> How would they (the poor) be paying for 'the rich or upper class
> indulgences'? If the rich purchase 'indulgences' wouldn't that benefit
> everyone - more money spent = more tax revenue, would it not?
>
> Again...not trying to be a shit stirrer (this time). I really just
> don't understand how this would be considered a 'poor tax'.
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> the issue of the flat tax (which is what this is in sheep's clothing), it
>> that it is retrogressive, it hits the poor far more than any other group.
>> Why should they pay for the rich or upper class indulgences? Frankly all
>> the proposal I've seen on this could only be classified as a Poor Tax.
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 6, 2012, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "The solution isn't to just raise taxes. It's to also put rules in place
>> to
>>>> safe-guard and penalize against hiding your money to avoid paying the
>>>> taxes."
>>>>
>>>> Or ditch the monstrosity that is the progressive income tax and move to a
>>>> national sales tax.
>>>
>>> I can certainly get behind reforming the tax code to steamline it and
>>> remove most (if not all) of the specialized deductions that keep
>>> adding entropy to the system. I certainly can't agree on the wisdom of
>>> switching from a progressive income tax to a national sales tax
>>> though. A progressive income tax is still, philosophically, the right
>>> way to go in my opinion. Obviously its current implementation leaves
>>> something to be desired.
>>>
>>> Judah
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:348180
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to