Yeah, actually you're right. I posted quickly and without really checking it out. Also didn't notice that it was World Net Daily, which is horrible.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected]>wrote: > > Wow, could that article and headline differ from the actual content any > more? > > "sharia"? can you say "out of your mind"? > > a) the "media" showed this whole discussion. > b) the host allowed the main woman to speak > c) they brought on a "dissenting" view (idiot Harvard professor, a > "divinity" prof, not a media person.) who "held the opposite view" > > The overall discussion I though was decent journalism by the host > (who, thankfully, has been obviously working on her speech > impediment), critically dissecting the original authors assertions in > the article, and allowing the original author to back up her arguments > (which I think she did well). > > I don't see anywhere in this piece where the "fourth estate" silenced > her, or suggested she shouldnt have published. The opposite, in fact. > without the tv piece, I would never have known of her OR her arguments > (which ALSO are part of the fourth estate)" > > unlike the "writer" who wrote the piece you linked to, all 5 lines of > original content, which was ALL rhetoric and polemic, with no > substance what so ever. > > Bad writing, bad reading comprehension. > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Our forth estate at work ladies and gentlemen. > > > > http://networkedblogs.com/xYRGo > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:351273 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
