I'm seen both before. Good read though. -----Original Message----- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 4:29 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Occupy Atlanta says - Don't talk to the police....
Without getting too academic here, you may want to consider this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_of_automobile_destruction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_effect the basic message is that memory is easily manipulated, especially by expectations and current beliefs. On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pierre Demester <[email protected]> wrote: > > rigggggghhhhhhhhtttt. what a way to divert. Congrats. I'm not even > sure if I am talking to a real person. Since I haven't "seen you". And > I haven't "known you" my entire life. I think you might be eliza. In > fact... I might be eliza. Crap. Eliza might be me and I don't really > exist. Great argument you provided though. Seriously, you might > consider law instead of developing software. > > If a person throws a rock at a piece of glass - it doesn't matter why > he threw a rock (except in court later on). The only thing that > matters is that he threw a rock. Make life simple on yourself and see > things for what they really are. Not for what you hear, or have been told - or want it to be. > > According to you... there is no proof he threw the rock - because he > might have been standing there eating lunch - and the rock somehow > jumped up. And all the photo shows is rock not touching his hand - but > coming from the general direction of it - heading for a piece of > glass. And because of the simple little fact... he did not in fact throw the rock. > > Wow... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Maureen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:31 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Occupy Atlanta says - Don't talk to the police.... > > > There are no "incorrect facts". If it is incorrect, it is either a > lie, a misconception, spin or disinformation - not a fact. > > A photo is also not a "fact". It is a photo. And you cannot > determine a fact from it unless you are aware of the context, and know > with certainty that it has not been doctored. > > Taking a picture of someone sitting on the ground at a protest and > labeling them as a dirty, unemployed hippie is not a fact. They might > have simply dropped by during their lunch break, or maybe they work the night shift. > > Unless you have 100% of the back story on everyone you photographed, > and you insist your clients only use them in context of that back > story, your pictures are just propaganda tools for whoever chooses to use them. > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Pierre Demester > <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Maybe perhaps... you are aware of incorrect facts ? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:351293 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
