I actually don't believe that Romney believes he is doing the right thing. I am not sure he understands the concept, after some of the recent coverage. So although I agree with your conclusion, I can't agree with your premises.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, Stewart is always awesome at revealing how absurd much of this is. > The Colbert was good too: if Mitt doesn't win the election he can just > retroactively retire from the race in 2009. > > People will debate this forever, but here's how it stacks up for me: > > * both candidates are smart > * both are accomplished in their respective strength skill sets > * both have skill gaps > * both are level headed and reasonable > * both seem to want to do "the right thing" and believe what they're doing > is the right thing > > Therefore, generically, we can expect almost no difference between these > two except at the edges. > > Thus the only difference is that Obama won't have a second election to run > for and will have a legacy to build so may be more motivated to take risks > to get out of the status quo. > > So I'm going with Obama, but if the shiz hits the fiz I'd want both of > these guys in the big-boy room > > > > On Jul 17, 2012, at 10:20 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If you don't look at anything else about this issue, look at this. > There's > > a Mitt Romney clip in here that is priceless. > > > > > http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-july-16-2012/democalypse-2012---bain-damage---romney-s-blind-trust > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:352752 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
