I most certainly can point out the errors on one side without it being a defense of the other. Stating the Romney's plan lacks specificity makes no comment at all on Obama's plan. That fact that you don't understand that is the reason you misinterpret the majority of what I post.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > You can't always attack one side and pretend your not doing it to > defend the other. That's like saying it depends on what the definition > of is is. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:356248 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
