I see you won't read the article and will just shout simple math. Let's try this:
2007 $161 Billion Deficit 2008 $459 Billion Deficit 2009 $1413 Billion Deficit 2010 $1294 Billion Deficit 2011 $1299 Billion Deficit 2012 $1100 Billion Deficit If Romney returns spending to 2008 levels at the least that's your $5 trillion (*10years) tax cut paid for. Everything else is gravy. If he cut's it more, let us pray he does, then even better. Add to that the fact that lowering the corporate tax rate always increases revenue it's paid for again. . On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Maureen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Flunked arithmetic and logic, didn't you? > > Let's try it in programming, since you purport to understand that. > > <cfif (variables.income - variables.deductions * variables.currentrate) gt > (variables.income * variables.newrate)> > The amount of money to pay for all government spending will be less and it > does not matter which deductions Romney will cut. > </cfif> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Then your statement has no purpose here. Romney does not plan on >> maintaining the same rate of spending. It's insane to think or imply >> the current $ trillion a year deficit is the norm. The article >> explains how to balance the tax cuts so they are cost neutral. It's >> not as easy as a + b - c and to pretend it is to support your pov is >> being dishonest. >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:356289 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
