Where did he say that? Call them all civil contracts, remove the religious angle totally from the governments part in it. On Oct 25, 2012 11:58 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, because separate but equal worked so well last time we tried it... > > ------------------------------------ > Three Ravens Consulting > Eric Roberts > Owner/Developer > [email protected] > tel: 630-486-5255 > fax: 630-310-8531 > http://www.threeravensconsulting.com > ------------------------------------ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:13 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: You have to wonder about those against same sex marriage > > > "People are protesting for civil contracts - the name of those contracts, > according to the government, is 'marriage'" > > Ehhh. Semantics. > > > > > "There was a time, not too long ago, when people felt the same way about > inter-racial marriage as they do now about gay marriage. It was wrong then. > It is wrong now." > > > There you go. I said the same thing in my original post. To quote: I have > confidence that gay marriage will eventually become a right in this > country. > > > > J > > - > > When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in > society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system > that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it. - Frederic Bastiat > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:356819 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
