Heh, according to the articles I found it has to do with the city not being able to verify the salt, fat and fiber content of the foods that are donated.
That's a fairly asinine reason... As for the food tampering issue with regards specifically to the red cross (the original point of my post), it may seem asinine to you, but it is a real possibility that must be accounted for. that takes resources. On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > Because restaurants that serve food and are certified by the health > department are now forced to throw away extra food and the homeless > can get it from the dumpster. Since there are no cases of food > tampering cans of food that are donated to charity I think it's > asinine. > > . > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, William Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> dunno. Why would it be necessarily "asinine" if he did? Are the >> reasons I gave below for /not/ accepting certain types of donations >> somehow illogical? >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357335 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
