I figured Mother Jones, I mean the Economist would have learned from their mistake four years ago. At least they're honest when they side against Romney because he supports Israel and we all know he wants to bomb away at Iran just for fun.
Give me a break. BTW, 40 million people still wont be covered by Obamacare. They just shifted teh people that are covered. . On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > The Economist does a really good job laying out where Obama has done well > and where he has royally fucked up (in their eyes) and follows it up with > an analysis of Romney. It's pretty damning on both sides. And while I don't > completely agree with everything they wrote, I think it does a good job of > laying out the picture in an even handed way. Worth a read. > > http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one > > Cheers, > Judah > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:357383 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
