I disagree but you know this.

What it boils down to me is that we can have many different styles of life
and government, while enjoying the prosperity and security of a much larger
nation.

In the end, with out another amendment it is the law of the land.
On Nov 17, 2012 1:13 AM, "Judah McAuley" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> States rights is bullshit.
>
> Government is government. The "theory" of states rights back in the days of
> yore was that a governmental body that was smaller in size, like a state,
> would be more responsive to the needs/desires of it's citizens. At least
> that's what they said. Of course it was really just that a lot of the
> colonies didn't particularly care for the others and had substantially
> different sets of people (say, Virginia plantations versus Pennsylvania
> Quakers).
>
> And what legitimacy the argument did have isn't really relevant any
> longer.  The entire population of the United States in the first census was
> about 4 million people. The population of Los Angeles County is 10 million
> now. If we are going under the theory that states are better at governing
> because they are more appropriately sized, then we should we should
> probably change the 10th Amendment to defer to Counties or Cities or, hell,
> even Boroughs in NYC are larger than several of the original States.
>
> Face it, the 10th Amendment was a sop to people holding onto the failed
> Articles of Confederation. Madison and other federalists argued that the
> whole thing was unneeded in the first place because it was obvious and
> already contained in the rest of the document. But people will rail against
> the Constitution now, just like they did in 1789.
>
> Anyway, the notion that states are better than the federal government is
> absolutely ludicrous. Legitimacy of government derives from the consent of
> the governed. It all stems from the will of the people and in the
> individual lays the source of all power and right. If a state does a better
> job of protecting the rights of the individual and the collective society
> they have formed a pact with, great. If the federal government does a
> better job, great. States have no rights. They are not people, just like
> corporations aren't people. People have rights and that's it. Period.
>
>
> Judah
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Gruss Gott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 16, 2012 2:41 PM, "LRS Scout" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Ol' bill and Obama aren't ever at odds with the constitution and the
> law?
> > >
> > > Onne signed the assault weapons ban and started the first go of the
> NDRP;
> > > the other doubled down on the Bush policies, signed the NDAA, updated
> the
> > > NDRP, and just had a 16 year old US citizen murdered without due
> process.
> > >
> > >
> > I'm with you on everything except for the assault weapons - I agree that
> it
> > shouldn't have been signed, but I think for a different reason:
> >
> > I don't believe the Constitution contains a federal prohibition on local
> > government legislation of private gun ownership.  My opinion is that
> states
> > (or cities for that matter) can legislate any gun control they want and I
> > think that's the best thing for America ... both because I believe in a
> > small federal government and I believe that's the top principle of the
> > Constitution: To set limits on how much the Federal government can invade
> > state's rights.
> >
> > Therefore my opinion is that the Constitution says that the Federal
> > government should neither be able to limit arms nor prevent
> > their limitation.
> >
> > A president shouldn't sign any such gun legislation simply because like
> > abortion, prostitution, and drugs, that's a state's rights issue.
> >
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:358479
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to