So you're cool with being paid much less than your peers etc. I could say something really snarky here but I'll let it go.
My point is if you benefit from the union, and most blue collar workers do, you ought to pay for it. Thing is we're mostly not blue collar workers and do not benefit from a union. I've worked several jobs where I did benefit from the union, and accordingly did not object to paying for the help the union provides. The so called right to work laws are not that. They should really be called the right to bust unions laws. On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:15 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > Statist, Ill do my own employment negotiations thank you. > On Dec 11, 2012 11:13 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> If you benefit from the union, i.e., wage and working conditions >> negotiations for instance, reasonable health insurance, or >> pension/401K provisions) why not pay for what you get instead of being >> a freeloader. You takers are just so annoying. >> >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Looks like Michigan is about to allow employees to actually start >> choosing >> > wether or not they are mandatorily required to pay a tax to unions. >> > >> > http://wapo.st/12j8GBN >> > >> > I can't imagine working anywhere that I am told I *HAVE* to pay something >> > to a union ON TOP OF THE TAXES I ALREADY PAY. What a ridiculous backwards >> > thing to want. >> > >> > This is a good thing. >> > >> > -Cameron >> > >> > ... >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359036 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
