I would feel offended but then, it occurs to me, as it always does, that almost everything you know about the Bible is seen through a Christian light, which is really a translation of a translation of a translation of the written law without the oral tradition. So I can't get offended because you're not talking about my book. You're talking about a book that is a translation of a translation of a translation, standing on its own.
Also there might be Christian commentaries about it that we don't even know. But do we really have to go and attack religion, when it's the madman who did this horrendous crime (murder -- last I looked, that was a no-no in the Bible) that we should be attacking? On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < [email protected]> wrote: > > well, maybe you'd like to specify what morals you're judging this rise of > moral relativism against? Maybe then I could hone my argument to be a > little bit more clear. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359434 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
