On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
[email protected]> wrote:

> considering there's a ruby vm that runs atop the jvm I think it's not
> really valid.


Granted, there isn't likely to be any huge vanishing act of RoR for the
same reasons that there won't be for CF.  But the real root idea here that
I find very interesting is the shift in focus on what's considered slow and
where people will start looking for bottlenecks and optimizations.

FWIW, Facebook has talked about putting PHP on top of a Java JVM as well:
http://nerds-central.blogspot.ie/2012/08/facebook-moving-to-jvm.html

I suspect that as the focus shifts to the app server more and more
languages will be rebuilt to compile lower down the stack and closer to the
metal in their execution.

-Cameron

...


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360048
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to