According to what I've read there have not any cases where that happened. To me it seems just to be another case of trying by any means to block a woman's freedom of choice.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < [email protected]> wrote: > > and who decides intent? Is it a real issue that a raped woman would > purposefully have an abortion to hide evidence? How about the doctor that > performs it? I still contend it's a poorly worded law and it seems the > lawmaker admits as much also. > > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:09 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > I see no gray area here with this language: > > > > "Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an > > abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a > > fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with > the > > intent to destroy evidence of the crime." > > > > Specifically because in includes the language "with the intent to destroy > > evidence of the crime." > > > > If that language were not included the yes, it would be sketchy. > > > > Until Later! > > C. Hatton Humphrey > > http://www.eastcoastconservative.com > > > > Every cloud does have a silver lining. Sometimes you just have to do > some > > smelting to find it. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hatton, you've gotta admit the wording of that law is a bit sketchy. > > They > > > could have easily limited it to anyone who coerces another person to > get > > an > > > abortion. By including the woman they've intentionally made it a gray > > > area. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:29 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Actually Jerry, it's none of the above. If you actually read the > > language > > > > of the bill rather than jump on the latest repost of the story, > you're > > > sure > > > > to find out the facts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://ablestmage.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/does-new-mexico-house-bill-206-make-rape-victims-felons-for-getting-an-abortion-no-heres-why/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 24, 2013 9:52 PM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See what happens if you don't lock your computer when you head to > the > > > > > restroom? > > > > > > > > > > She must have been "punked" by a coworker. There is no way this is > > > real. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:360441 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
