I don't agree. While a few thumpers might try to change policy, it's not that likely. But the infringing on freedom to worship is getting stronger each year.
. On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:15 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> I can see that. I tend to view it the opposite way because the bible >> thumpers tend to have a concrete impact on my life (see marriage equality >> laws, prayer in school, buying liquor on Sunday, lack of coverage for birth >> control in health plans, etc) whereas militant atheists tend to be fairly >> harmless cranks. If Atheists were running government and trying to clamp >> down on otherwise chill religious folks, I'd probably feel the other way >> around. >> > > I agree with what everyone's said. It would seem that perhaps we feel that > while mouthy atheists are more annoying, the bible thumpers are perhaps > more dangerous, since they actually carry influence and can affect policy. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:361073 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
