You really need to learn to count. Even with your ridiculous logic twisting you cannot dismiss the sheer weight.
The stupid ignorance you're displaying is disgusting and contemptuous. On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Jerry Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > "The grand total of articles that questioned global warming or whether rising > emissions are the cause: 24." > > Ehhh. Another propaganda piece. > > > I like this part from the author: > > *By my definition* 24 of the 13,950 *articles*, 0.17% or 1 in 581, clearly > reject global warming or endorse a cause other than CO2 emissions for > observed warming. > > > Also, the author searched for two terms: > > "global warming" or "global climate change." > > This would leave out articles like: Influence of the Southern Oscillation > on tropospheric temperature > > Maybe the authors of papers like this aren't concerned with social > engineering so the didn't include the key words. > > I can give you a link to 900 peer reviewed articles challenging man made > global warming, but I doubt you want it. > > J > > - > > Ninety percent of politicians give the other ten percent a bad reputation. > - Henry Kissinger > > Politicians are people who, when they see light at the end of the tunnel, > go out and buy some more tunnel. - John Quinton > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:361815 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
