Fox news was the only source on television that even picked it up. That just tells me more about the other news media bias, and I'm not a republican "foaming at the mouth".
There were just as many democrats on that panel yesterday "politicking" and slamming the testimony of three individuals who dedicated their lives to this country and still kept their composure quite well under the circumstances. I wasn't expecting a "smoking gun" or even a prosecution because that's how our system works (unfortunately). But I would like to hear the truth. And the truth to me sounds like someone at the highest level is either really incompetent or there was a cover up. Either way, it's not something that "shouldn't matter" and it's not something happened "long ago". The election is over, so we should be able to hear about it regardless. I would expect Jon Stewart to make jokes about it, it's his job, and when you put that crap online as a valid source, it's just as telling. The attitude of the current Administration is not one of professionalism when it comes to this tragedy. No accountability for the misinformation that was fed to the general public. Clinton lied under oath about the 2:00am phone call to Hicks. That right there says something about a cover up. Then 5 interviews from Rice blabbing a BS story that was already proven incorrect from the Libyan President, and the initial phone calls from embassy saying, "We're under attack"? Come on... -----Original Message----- From: Vivec [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 8:39 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: How bout those hearings Quite. Listening to Fox news, they keep saying "If" "What If" "If" ... nothing is proven, and they are frothing at the mouth. And now, after all these hearings, NOTHING is proven, and there is NO coverup... But Fox and supporters can still say "If" ... smh. I mean..what IF there was no coverup, they did all they could, and it was just a terrible tragedy. Just as the other 54 attacks on diplomats. I love the clip though , " So...IF there was a coverup, what were they trying to coverup?" and there's no response. The response is " that's what we are trying to find out". It's creating an issue out of nothing. What IF... ridiculous. On 9 May 2013 09:23, Matthew S Blatchley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Haha... that's a good one. Oh wait, you're serious? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vivec [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 8:13 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: How bout those hearings > > > So by now I suppose you all know that those hearings have failed to > turn up any definite proof that there was any coverup. > > So are you going to say that you were wrong, and let the matter rest? > > And as usual, here is Jon Stewart setting the records straight :) > > > http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/09/jon-stewart-highlights-bullsht-m > ountai ns-history-of-hysteria-to-mock-benghazi-hearing/ > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:363394 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
