I don't know how or why the government didn't pay out the benefits it should and I think that's a crime. Put to use the court to label people bigots is a turn for the worse. That's the issue here, not the funds.
. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:43 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > Heh...it would cost too much money to provide benefits to people who always > should have had them from the beginning! > > Even that argument would probably be rooted in bigotry. People only dislike > government money being spent if it's being spent on something or SOMEONE > they don't like. Conservatives pretend to hate spending tax money, and use > that claim when they call for the ending of farm subsidies or planned > parenthood support....but $2 billion dollar stealth planes?? We'll take 50! > > That's why that big and bloated Farm Bill passes every time (i know house > rejected it, but it will still pass in some odious form), it's because > everyone likes the idea of helping farmers...which is why it's proponents > probably make certain to always call it the "Farm Bill". It's really the > "Food Stamps Bill". > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > It is going to cost more money out of the federal tax base, because > people > > that were previously denied are now going to qualify for things. > > > > (estate taxes, health care, ss benefits, immigration marriage issues, > etc). > > > > (Not a good argument, imho, but possibly factual) > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:26 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok then, I have a serious question (or series of questions): > > > > > > For what other reason, besides bigotry, would someone oppose gay > > marriage? > > > What possible argument could anyone have to oppose gay marriage that > > would > > > not contain the sense that for some reason a "straight marriage" is > > > superior to a "gay marriage"? > > > > > > And if you believe gay marriage is inferior, or harmful, purely because > > of > > > the participants sexual orientation.....then how are you NOT being > > bigoted > > > against gays???? > > > > > > And as a side bar...why does someone who DOES support gay marriage > (you), > > > feel such an obligation to prop up those who oppose it??? You don't > need > > to > > > protect conservatives from me....if they aren't bigoted, I won't attack > > > them. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Calling someone a bigot because of lack of understand of the facts is > > > never > > > > funny. It's promoting hate to paint someone with a legitimate legal > > > > position as a hater. The only way that can be even a little funny is > > if > > > > you truly believed he hates gays. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:21 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Luckily I don't have that attitude, so you have misread me (once > > > again). > > > > > > > > > > I was just asking a question. Satire always takes a person's views, > > > good > > > > or > > > > > bad, and exaggerates them. YOu call it hate because it's making fun > > of > > > a > > > > > position you agree with. I call it sort-of funny...but not all that > > > > > original. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? > > > > > > > > > > > > So you must also believe that Scalia and everyone else that > didn't > > > > agree > > > > > > with this legal decision hates gays. You really need to get past > > the > > > > > "agree > > > > > > with me or you're a bigot" attitude. > > > > > > > > > > > > just saying > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:50 PM, GMoney <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what's hateful about it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sam <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ignorant hate disguised as humor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Cameron Childress < > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/borowitzreport/2013/03/bitter-scalia-leaves-us.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:364964 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
