Danger and safety are supposed to be irrelevant in these discussions in this country. That's part of the problem.
I know what the law says today. That doesn't make it right in a free republic. On Jul 8, 2013 8:40 AM, "Cameron Childress" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:19 AM, LRS Scout wrote: > > > Over the limit does not mean there will be an accident. I don't is even > a 1 > > in 100 chance of there being an accident. > > > > The crime occurs when the accident does and not before. > > > While I can see a valid theoretical discussion about this, the actual law > here is super clear. > > I'm all about personal freedoms as long as you aren't endangering someone > else. Even if you argue this is a slippery slope, drunk driving is at the > "extraordinarily dangerous" end of that slope. > > -Cameron > > ... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365251 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
