I am not denying anything. I have not questioned the verdict. He was found not guilty of the crimes for which he was charged. That does not translate to him not bearing any responsibility for what happened.
He followed (after being told not to), shot and killed someone. That cannot be denied, but it seems that some are trying. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:51 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would have accepted a guilty verdict. > > You guys are denying reality. > On Jul 23, 2013 2:37 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > As I said... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:21 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: RE: Zimmerman rescues family of 4 from car crash > > > > > > The court and jury decided that. > > > > Its a fact of law. > > On Jul 23, 2013 2:19 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Just as you want him to be innocent and nothing would convince you > > > otherwise... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: LRS Scout [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 10:28 AM > > > To: cf-community > > > Subject: Re: Zimmerman rescues family of 4 from car crash > > > > > > > > > And that's it right there. > > > > > > Larry and Scott and the rest want him to be guilty do in their mind he > > is. > > > Guilty until proven innocent. > > > > > > That's not how things are supposed to work in this nation. > > > On Jul 23, 2013 10:52 AM, "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > That's the story we're given and after all is said and done nothing > > > > disputes his view. Any other views are based on nothing. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can see where revolution is coming from. > > > > > > > > > > But he also makes assumptions about Martin and the scenario. > > > > > > > > > > He assumes that Zimmerman was telling the truth about how the > > > > confrontation > > > > > happened. > > > > > > > > > > On 22 July 2013 20:31, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I agree with the implication that Sam was > > > > > > incoherent in > > > > > this > > > > > > thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > While it appears he and I have differing opinions on this, I > > > > > > think Sam > > > > > was > > > > > > quite reasonable in his replies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:365869 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
