On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < [email protected]> wrote:
> > This difference Sam, is that one blog is not my sole source of refutation, > unlike you. You have no sources. The guys you parrot got caught lying. It's BS and you should realize that by now. BTW, I linked to CNSNews and they had a link in the text I pasted to Watts page. I didn't even see it. Whenever someone posts a GW link, here is Sam's obligatory > link to the WattsUpWithThat blog. A blog run by a Heartland Institute > member...Surprise! It's against GW! > You did notice his sources (DMI and ARCUS)? These are legitimate "science" sources. His blog is a resource or latest news and analysis. A one stop shop. You make it sound like he just rambles on about his feelings. The blog includes many guest bloggers and they almost always discuss current news releases by legitimate data sources. Many many data sources. Unlike you and your "Inconvenient Truth" movie. It's very similar to someone who keeps posting links to a site that claims > that aliens are real and visit earth regularly and they're whole source of > information is only sites that agree with their position. > > You're a bit simple sometimes eh? I could link to all the individual articles and sometimes do, but you seem to discredit anything from that site. That would discredit NASA, National Geographic, American Geophysical Union, DMI etc. > But hey, keep posting the link. He's got pretty colors on his > graphs...Doesn't matter if the guy cherry picks info...the graphs are still > pretty. > The pretty graph is from http://www.arcus.org/search/seaiceoutlook/2013/june So you're actually accusing the Arctic Research Consortium of the U.S. of cherry picking data. While I'm at it, I think I'll email my Channel 8 meteorologist and ask him > his opinion on GW and whatever his opinion is, I'll accept it > wholeheartedly. Screw the other scientists who are studying this.. They're > obviously in it for the money. > Let's talk about the scientists studying this... ...on a related note, since I've started my new position, I am amazed at > how much money there is to be made in internet advertising, especially on a > site that gets a lot of traffic. Hmmm....I wonder how you could drive a > lot of traffic to your blog. Oh, I know, cater to a segment of the > population that has firmly held beliefs and then reinforce them with pretty > graphs. > There's a lot more money to be made selling carbon credits. Look into that. . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366440 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
