True gel, but any framework is more complicated than no framework. The beauty of rails is that it's so opinionated about things, it keeps developers in line on how they implement stuff. In my new job, even though now of the previous developers remained, I was easily up to speed on the app with the help of the structure and test files. This is not usually the case with non-framework sites.
Sent from my iPad On Sep 8, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rails is more complicated than CF , period. > The things you wish you knew before you started along a particular road! > > ^_^ > > I've been told that the ruby/rails way is better. I can't figure out why, > yet. > Maybe someone here can explain... > > On 8 September 2013 00:45, Justin Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Not really CF specific so I'm putting this here instead of CF-Talk. >> >> I saw this article come through my news feed regarding URL parameters >> in Rails and thought, "hmm, is that really how Rails handles URL >> variables?" >> >> >> http://agilewarrior.wordpress.com/2013/08/31/how-to-pass-parameters-as-part-of-the-url-in-rails/ >> >> I'm curious if anyone here "speaks" rails and can weigh in on the way >> this article suggests handling URL variables. On the face it seems a >> lot more complicated than the CF url scope, but I'm not well versed in >> Rails so am I missing something or is this the proper way to do that >> in Rails? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:366954 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
