both are good articles, thanks.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's more complicated than all of that (as usual). > > There are a number of parts to the platform. The original design was > modern, sleek, and open-source. Further platform work went to CGI, which > was closed-source, more gnarly, and not done in an collaborative fashion. > > > http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-16/open-source-everything-the-moral-of-the-healthcare-dot-gov-debacle > > There are both positive and negative examples in the roll out and lessons > to be learned all around. > > Cheers, > Judah > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/06/healthcaregov-code-developed-by-the-people-and-for-the-people-released-back-to-the-people/277295/ > > > > Interesting explanation of how healthcare.gov was developed. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:367907 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
