The ruling said: "We agree with the district court that once funds are dedicated to the state's Minimum Foundation Program for public education, the constitution prohibits those funds from being expended on the tuition costs of nonpublic schools and nonpublic entities."
They just need to fund it from a different pot. Like the Obamacare mandate wasn't a tax but the supreme court only allowed because it was a tax. You just need to redefine it as a tax rebate. . On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Eric Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > > Paying for religious education with taxpayer money is a violation of the > first amendment since they teach religion. Courts have ruled on this many > times. The courts in Louisiana blocked the voucher law there on that > basis. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 8:58 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Creationism in public schools, mapped. Where tax money > supports > alternatives to evolution. > > > Maybe you misunderstood the first amendment. These States did not make laws > respecting the establishment of religion. What they did was admit they can > not or will not try to educate children that are disadvantaged so they gave > them a tax refund and asked them to sort out their own education. > > . > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Eric Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It's tax payer funding of religious schools, which is a violation of > > the 1st amendment. Period. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369420 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
