I don't think he has a task argument under the currently recognized laws customs and philosophies of the United states.
I think he's right according to what was promised, and written, to his family and many others like them a hundred and more years ago under what, let's be honest, was a different system of government. 1. The federal government was never intended to own 80% of a states land mass. 2. The BLM was created to mange access to these lands and improve them for use by these ranchers, that's it's charter, not finding excuses to shut down ranches, which is now it's mission as they have said themselves on many occasions. 3. The federal government isn't supposed to have criminal arrest powers, those didn't properly exist until after Lincoln, and even then most federal agents went unarmed and used local or state law enforcement to effect arrests. They certainly didn't have tanks and machine guns and snipers go after a dude over what is a civil matter, not a criminal one. Add in the 5700 acres of land ready for development by Reid and his son and yes, people are ready to shoot over this issue, right now, today. On Apr 25, 2014 1:35 PM, "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the BLM along with Harry Reid and son are about as corrupt in > Nevada as you can possibly get, but Dem corruption is so commonplace it's > boring. > > From what I read so far I don't think Bundy actually has a real argument. > > . > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:29 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > How about his free speech is irrelevant to a civil complaint against the > > BLM? > > > > How about Thomas sowell and Malcolm x used many if the exact same words, > > for the sand rain, if you look at the full interview > > On Apr 25, 2014 12:59 PM, "Vivec" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Lol...so you are saying that even if you do find a racist republican, > > it's > > > the democrats fault. > > > > > > There's no point in continuing this particular conversation with you if > > > that's your line of reasoning. > > > That reasoning and the equally ridiculous: Democrats have done it and > > said > > > it in the past, or decades ago Democrats were the KKK. > > > > > > All absolutely irrelevant to what is happening right now, and actually > > for > > > the last few years. To try to ignore it is just ridiculous. > > > > > > I thought that a better defence, and one which could never be verified, > > was > > > that Democrats were making these same misogynist, racist, and > homophobic > > > statement but the liberal press just wasn't reporting it. > > > > > > Try that as a rebuttal next time ;-) > > > ᧠> > > > > > > > > On 25 April 2014 12:35, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > If you find a racist Republican it's likely because the Democrats > > > > have been telling everyone that is were the racists are so they > joined > > > up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:369951 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
