Gravity has been tested and in most cases it's proven. AGW has never been successfully tested. As for consensus, you can't just say scientist think something might be so and call it settled science. That goes against the scientific method. But you know that.
. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would you prefer that there is consensus on Global Warming? > Because that's all that is needed to act. > > We are still investigating Gravity, but the fact that it exists is pretty > much settled...sorry...there is consensus that it exists. > > Playing with words doesn't alter that. > > He sounds like a paid political hack. > ᧠> > > On 12 May 2014 13:28, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Like say, this tidbit: > > "The debate is settled," asserted propagandist in chief Barack Obama in > > his latest State of the Union address. "Climate change is a fact." > Really? > > There is nothing more anti-scientific than the very idea that science is > > settled, static, impervious to challenge. Take a non-climate example. It > > was long assumed that mammograms help reduce breast cancer deaths. This > > fact was so settled that Obamacare requires every insurance plan to offer > > mammograms (for free, no less)... > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370075 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
