Extra scrutiny, yes, of course. And since the name of the group is often indicative of their politicization, just a name search on buzzwords seems reasonable. Regardless of political stance.
But punitive or extra scrutiny due to the specific beliefs is anti-American, in my opinion. (again, regardless of political stance) I wish people would stop looking at EVERYTHING through a political lens. That is hurting our country more than the actual politics on either side. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]>wrote: > > Political-identified groups should be targeted for extra scrutiny when > applying for 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4). > > I'd be interested in hearing what you have around the DOJ and VA though. > > Cheers, > Judah > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:30 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I've been following these stories pretty close. > > > > It's not just the IRS, but DOJ, EVEN the VA. > > On May 15, 2014 9:45 AM, "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-documents-show-irs-hq-control-tea-party-targeting/ > > > > > > I know it's not news, but maybe it should be. > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:370114 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
