I think that this is the part in the Raw Story article that he may be
talking about, as it references both Biblical stories and Tom Sawyer.  As
far as I can tell, we've got it right, the study shows that kids who
uncritically accept the fantastical in Bible stories also uncritically
accept the fantastical in non-Biblical stories at a greater rate than those
children who aren't raised religious.

>From the story:
The researchers took 66 children between the ages of five and six and asked
them questions about stories — some of which were drawn from fairy tales,
others from the Old Testament — in order to determine whether the children
believed the characters in them were real or fictional.

“Children with exposure to religion — via church attendance, parochial
schooling, or both — judged [characters in religious stories] to be real,”
the authors wrote. “By contrast, children with no such exposure judged them
to be pretend,” just as they had the characters in fairy tales. But
children with exposure to religion judged many characters in fantastical,
but not explicitly religious stories, to also be real — the equivalent of
being incapable of differentiating between Mark Twain’s character Tom
Sawyer and an account of George Washington’s life.


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> > Ahh....did I miss that somewhere or was that just an
>
> assumption being made?
>
>
> He didn't explicitly say it, but it seems to be what he is saying while
> trying not to have to say it that way.
>
> ....
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:371833
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to