You don't need to be a lawyer to answer the question. It's a logical one, and not answering is simply prevarication.
But let us play that game, and make it even simpler until your only response other than to answer truthfully, would be to refuse to answer. If YOU were accused of rape, and you are innocent. You have been wrongly accused. Would you want a member of that Jury to be a woman who had been gang raped more than once? I would not, to answer the question myself. Would you? On 10 September 2014 11:37, Scott Stroz <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, now it is a jury member and not a judge? > > I am not a lawyer. I have never been a lawyer. I have never spoken with > lawyers about the nuances of jury selection. I have never served on a jury. > I have never discussed with anyone who has served on a jury what the > selection process was like. I will likely never be part of a jury selection > process, So, no, I cannot answer that question. > > Can you answer my question?. Are you implying that a rape victim is > incapable of being objective about other rape cases? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372393 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
