But, not necessarily in the way you presented it. "more likely to punish wrongdoing as a third party to a nonviolent offense than when [they're] victimized by it."
First..it talks about 'non-violent' crimes. Second, this goes against what you had argued. If I recall, your stance was that a woman who was gang raped would/should/could not be part of a jury in a rape case. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > A while back, on the Rice domestic Violence issue I was of the opinion that > being the victim of a crime such as Rape , would affect your view on > punishment and justice for a similar crime. > > Many people were of the opinion that being the victim of a violent crime, > even one of such a severe sexual nature, would not affect the view of > Justice for that crime. > > Science says it does. Being the victim of a crime does affect your view on > justice, and punishment. > > > http://mic.com/articles/102728/science-explains-why-true-justice-is-actually-a-myth > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372846 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
