On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Vivec <[email protected]> wrote: > > So now the REPUBLICAN House Committee is biased? > LOL! > I didn't say that.
> Everyone that doesn't agree with the ridiculous rhetoric is biased...every > single independent investigation....is biased? I didn't say that. > "No wrongdoing by Obama Administration Appointees" The administration knew, during the attacks, that it was al Qaeda. The talking points blamed a video for over a week. The report said that was not illegal. > "No missed opportunities for rescue" Not one shot was fired from the diplomatic guards. Didn't the Seals on the roof break direct orders? > "No evidence of a CIA coverup of arms" No evidence the CIA moved arms. The CIA helped other governments move them. Also, the reason the CIA was there was to infiltrate terrorist groups. Hello, big failure there. > ??? > exactly. Your argument seems to be nothing could have been done to prevent the attack or keep the ambassador from being murdered. . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372988 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
