That article made no sense at all to me. "The new new working paper found that the expiration of benefits was responsible for the creation of over 1.8 million jobs. Nearly 1 million of those jobs were created by workers who would have otherwise stayed out of the labor force if unemployment benefits had been extended. Overall, almost 3 million jobs were created in 2014."
So the jobs were magically created by unemployed people looking for them? The number of people looking for work far outpaced the number of jobs available. How...just, what? Could someone try to explain their logic? It really makes less than 0 sense to me as written. Judah On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2559267 > > ... > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:373143 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
