> Todd wrote: > > > >>How hard would it be to come up with a situation in which US Federal Law > >>says (not) do A and the law of country X says (not) to do B? > > > > I'm not sure what you mean? > > Let's see if we can get an example. Does the Federal Law have any > article that basically says that if you have a chance of stopping > somebody from breaking the law you should?
I don't know .. that one is tricky. I'm sure law enforcement officials don't expect you to put yourself in harm's way, but then again, there's nothing that prevents you from trying to stop a crime if you wish, unless you are getting in the way, or endagering someone else by getting involved, or doing something illegal like blowing away a would be criminal without cause. > > Who was it that made the comment that if U.S. pilots were allowed to cary > > guns that they hoped the pilots would be arrested as soon as they arrived > > for breaking the law there? ;) > > Not me. If you mean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I specifically say > that I don't care what the US does, but that pilots should be arrested > if they carry guns while entering this country. That is something quite > different from being arrested upon entering the Netherlands 3 weeks > after carrying a gun on a flight from Boston to Chicago. Fair enough, but carrying a gun from Boston to Chicago isn't commiting any crimes against the Netherlands nor its citizens, as opposed to your DMCA example. :) Todd > Jochem ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
