If he doesn't then he is breaking the surrender agreement made back in 91/92
Shawn Regan -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:54 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Reason not to attack Iraq Good article. I would say this, if Saddam allows inspectors back into Iraq and agrees with the policies that was set after Desert Storm, that we let him stay. If he fails to comply with this, then by all means he should be removed from power. He has the desire and the means to acquire WMD and does not have a problem in using them. He is not concerned about how we might retalliate for the use of them, against us, due to his use of them on his own people. The ball is in his court, and he will be the one to decide. Douglas Brown Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: Reason not to attack Iraq > Hopefully, GW has learned to read and at a level that allows him to comprehend the consequences involved with an attack > on Iraq. There have been several well-written articles on the subject recently and this is a particularly good one: > > http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-bandow081202.asp > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
