cfhelp wrote:
 > Nobody weights more or less on or in any planet, moon or other object 
just
 > because you are there. Your weight is set by your mass.

Both statements are incorrect.


Mass is the amount of substance there inside the defined boundaries of
your system. Mass is an intrinsic property, i.e. it is not dependend on
anything outside the defined boundaries of your system.

Weight is the force excerted by the mass inside the defined boundaries
of your system on another object as the result of a constant accelarion.
Weight is an extrinsic property, i.e. it depends on things outside the
defined boundaries of your system.

If we take you to be the defined system, it is reasonable to say that
your weight is the force your mass excerts on the ground beneath you
under the influence of the gravity. But if you are in an elevator that
is in free fall, you don't excert that force and you are truely weightless.
Your weight is actually the product of an accelleration and your mass.
And since the gravity (an accelleration) could be different on different
planets, your weight could be different there as well.


 > Jupiter is heavier
 > than Earth and Earth is heaver than Venus.

Not necessarily true. Since weight (according to the dictionary heavier
means "of more weight") depends on an object outside the system you can
not say this without defining that extra object. And if you leave all
objects outside your system out of the equation, all three planets are
weightless.


 > I am heavier than most people
 > because I have a large mass (I am a Tall Fat Bustard). This being 
said the
 > reason why you weight less on Luna (that's our moon) is because the scale
 > has changed. But in the center of the earth the scale is still Earths.

scale?

 > The pressure would be intense. Oh say, much more than being a few miles
 > below the surface of the ocean. Of course you would be liquefied and then
 > weight less because you would have changed your mass.

Could you elaborate? Both on being liquefied and on the change of mass.

 > Quantum Mechanics anyone?

Hardly relevant for the issue, unless we get to the densities that force
electrons out of their orbitals into fission with the associated protons
and only the "zero point" energy prevents the formation of a black hole.

Jochem

PS If some of the terms appear badly translated, please Google. I don't
normally discuss this when I am sober nor do I tend to do it in English.


______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to