I have found my self doing this a few times. I have had a number of
circumstances where it has been required.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: SQL Wackiness
> 
> holy cow! I feel your pain man...I think these dba's do this
> kind of stuff on purpose, simply for job security.
> Once things get that layered, I know I would have difficulty holding
> all the pieces in my head at once. I hope you have a big monitor ;)
> 
> --
>  jon
>  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 12:09:19 PM, you wrote:
> MM> You don't know how many times I've tried to tell our so called
'dba'
> MM> that.  At this location, we're joining views upon view upon views.
I
> MM> was trying to debug one view that was #8 in a succession of views,
and
> MM> each one of those was made up of at least 3 joins inside.
> 
> MM> Marlon
> 
> MM> jon hall wrote:
> 
> >>Well the fact that you are joining two views might have something to
> >>do with it...why not bypass the whole view routine and build a new
> >>view altogether, and see if that fixes it?
> >>
> >>Maybe it's just me, but joining views seems counter to the purpose
of
> >>a view anyway.
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to