Hell, when I transfer busses in the Tenderloin at 5am, I wish I had one
with me.

;)
~bgl

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: Timothy Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 9:56 AM
--> To: CF-Community
--> Subject: RE: Court Upholds Calif. Assault Weapons Ban
--> 
--> Ok,
-->     And in another 100 years when they are killing you for speaking
--> your mind, or wanting to vote?  You would sure wish you could have
that
--> AK in the closet then.
--> 
--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:52 PM
--> To: CF-Community
--> Subject: Re: Court Upholds Calif. Assault Weapons Ban
--> 
--> 
--> I'm all for being able to have guns, but people dont need to have
--> ASSAULT
--> weapons.
--> 
--> Someone breaks into your house capping them with 3 or 4 shots from a
--> rifle
--> or gun is as good as unloading a clip of 30 into their torso with an
--> assault
--> rifle
--> 
--> 
--> 
--> 
--> ----- Original Message -----
--> From: "Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:32 PM
--> Subject: Re: Court Upholds Calif. Assault Weapons Ban
--> 
--> 
--> > San Francisco, CA... no surprise.
--> >
--> > At 12:14 PM 12/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
--> > >Court Upholds Calif. Assault Weapons Ban
--> > >
--> > >Thu Dec 5,10:36 PM ETAdd U.S. National - AP to My Yahoo!
--> > >
--> > >By DAVID KRAVETS, Associated Press Writer
--> > >
--> > >SAN FRANCISCO(AP) - A federal appeals court unanimously upheld
--> > >California's ban on assault weapons Thursday, saying
--> > >individuals had no right to bear arms under the Second Amendment.
--> > >
--> > >"The historical record makes it equally plain that the amendment
was
--> not
--> > >adopted in order to afford rights to
--> > >individuals with respect to private gun ownership or possession,"
--> Judge
--> > >Stephen Reinhardt wrote in the 9th U.S. Circuit
--> > >Court of Appeals decision.
--> > >
--> > >Weapons owners challenged amendments to a 1989 law that
originally
--> > >outlawed 75 high-powered weapons with rapid-fire
--> > >capabilities. The Legislature passed the nation's first law
banning
--> such
--> > >weapons after a gunman fired a semiautomatic
--> > >weapon into a Stockton school yard, killing five children and
--> injuring
--> 30.
--> > >
--> > >Following California's lead, several states and the federal
--> government
--> > >passed similar or even stricter bans.
--> > >In 1999, California lawmakers amended the law to ban assault
weapons
--> based
--> > >on a host of features instead of specific
--> > >makes and models - a move that outlawed hundreds of so-called
copycat
--> > >weapons not clearly defined in the initial law.
--> > >
--> > >"While I respect the rights of Californians to pursue hunting and
--> sports
--> > >shooting, and of law-abiding citizens to
--> > >protect their homes and businesses, there is no need for these
--> military
--> > >style weapons to be on the streets in our
--> > >state," said Bill Lockyer,
--> > >California's attorney general.
--> > >
--> > >The National Rifle Association said it was disappointed with the
--> ruling.
--> > >
--> > >"From an organizational standpoint, for 131 years we've been
standing
--> > >steadfastly to protect the freedoms of all law
--> > >abiding Americans and stand steadfastly that the Second Amendment
is
--> an
--> > >individual right and will continue to do so,"
--> > >said NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam.
--> > >
--> > >Arulanandam said it was too early to tell what the effects of the
--> decision
--> > >would be.
--> > >
--> > >Attorneys for the suing gun owners did not immediately return
phone
--> calls
--> > >Thursday.
--> > >
--> > >
--> >
--> 
-->

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to