sun is a bunch of whining babies ;) though lol ----- Original Message ----- From: "cfhelp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:25 PM Subject: RE: whaaaaaa
> What!? I am confused... > > I must have missed the memo SUN Bad Microsoft Good? > > :) > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:57 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: whaaaaaa > > No, a few years ago Sun was wanting Windows to either ship with Sun's JVM or > take the JVM out all together. MS called their bluff and decided to take the > JVM out all together. Sun wet their pants and started suing some more to get > it back. > > I don't like Sun. I would feel better about java if it weren't for them > having control of it. Better watch out, if developers start dropping Java, > Sun might feel obliged to sue, forcing them into using it again. It wouldn't > be far off from what they're currently trying to pull :) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:50 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: whaaaaaa > > > > > > Isn't it that they have to include sun's jre? And not their own hacked > > and partly incompatible jre, I thought the whole crux of the > > problem was > > that ms had been messing about with java and sun weren't happy. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 16 January 2003 18:54 > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: whaaaaaa > > > > While I agree with Sun's winning the 20 million dollar lawsuit a while > > back, I think this is just stupid. They shouldn't be forced to include > > Java, and there should be a time limit involved if they are. > > > > I may be reading the situation wrong, but it's seems kind of like a > > double jeopardy situation. Sun already won a seperate lawsuit against > > Microsoft, and now Microsoft is being penalized for the same thing in > > as part of the antitrust case. In the previous case, Microsoft is not > > allowed to distribute Java after 2008 (maybe earlier?) iirc, without > > renegotiating a new licensing agreement with Sun. Now the court is > > saying that Microsoft has to include Java. > > > > This is setting up a sweet little niche for Sun, one that they don't > > deserve imo. At least under Windows it is faster, and easier to > > program an application using .Net than Java. > > > > -- > > jon > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thursday, January 16, 2003, 1:16:51 PM, you wrote: > > CA> whaaaaa... I'm Sun Microsystems. > > > > CA> whaaaa..... don't put that software in your operating system. > > > > CA> whaaa... I think I'll sue you for putting that in there. > > > > CA> whaaa.... why did you take that software out of your operating > > system. > > > > CA> whaaaa.... now we're screwed. > > > > CA> whaaaa... I think I'll sue you for not putting it in your > > operating > > system. > > > > CA> whaaaa.... we won. > > > > > > CA> whaaaaa... we're pathetic. > > > > CA> whaaa.... where's my ba ba. whaaaa. > > > > CA> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
