And tested on animals.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 4:10 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: SUV's and Dead Horses > > > No, you can't use cyanide since its a environmentally > unfriendly chemical. > > Try again. > > Jerry Johnson > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/28/03 03:57PM >>> > You are so right - I say those of us who really love this Earth commit > mass suicide! I have the Cool-ade!!! Anybody have any cyanide? > > Matthew Small > IT Supervisor > Showstopper National Dance Competitions > 3660 Old Kings Hwy > Murrells Inlet, SC 29576 > 843-357-1847 > http://www.showstopperonline.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Cantrell [mailto:"Cantrell] > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:51 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: SUV's and Dead Horses > > Yes, or even further, having the children to consume those > fossil fuels > - > all of your babies are little fuel consuming demons with no purpose > other > than to rape and pillage the land. Get real. It's an argument over > something > that is so obviously frivolous that it needs a good public critique. > Plus > the defenses and deflecting (like yours) are entertaining. > > I could come up with a good SUV owner response and go on about how > electricity isn't produced solely through burning fossil > fuels and how I > need my energy to feed my family in zimbabwe or to go rescue > baby seals > or > something, but I won't. ;) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:43 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: SUV's and Dead Horses > > > > > > I find it amazing that nobody bothers to think about all the > > other ways > > of using fossil fuels - like burning it to produce > > electricity in order > > to write countless emails to nobody in particular decrying > the use of > > fossil fuels in SUVs. > > > > :-) > > > > > > Matthew Small > > IT Supervisor > > Showstopper National Dance Competitions > > 3660 Old Kings Hwy > > Murrells Inlet, SC 29576 > > 843-357-1847 > > http://www.showstopperonline.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Cantrell [mailto:"Cantrell] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 3:33 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: SUV's and Dead Horses > > > > And people who are proactive about the environment aren't demonized? > > > > People who are against going to war with a broke country > incapable of > > defending itself aren't demonized? > > > > Sorry, but I have no pity for people who choose to be slobs and act > > inefficient just because they can, or because it's the cool > > thing to do. > > I'm > > not telling you to not drive a big crap-box piece-o-shiat SUV, but I > > will > > point out that a lot of people think you look silly and that > > you have no > > reason to own one (yes, we know you tow your boat once a year). > > > > ;) > > > > hehe - hope I didn't step into another SUV thread. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:22 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: SUV's and Dead Horses > > > > > > > > > Its easy to demonize people for their choices. SUVs are an > > > easy target, > > > they are large and they have a number of people who drive them. > > > > > > People point to the super large Lincolns, Fords, Chevys, > > and other and > > > complain, but the majority of the ones I see are the > smaller Jeeps, > > > Fords, Izzuzzzuzzzuzu ;), and others. > > > > > > Now, at the same time, the auto makers do have > technologies they can > > > roll out that would make the gas mileage better and the > > > pollution less. > > > But the people don't demand it. > > > > > > But I agree with you Erika the difference of one or two > > miles a gallon > > > isn't that big. But people need a target, those two miles give the > > > complainers something to complain about, a target. Because of > > > the people > > > who commonly drive them, they can create big evil groups > of people. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 2:09 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: SUV's and Dead Horses > > > > > > > > Not to beat to beat the dead horse here ... But I was > > > looking up some > > > > fairly popular cars versus a couple of SUV's ... And I > > think some of > > > the > > > > differences in gas mileage is negligible and even a > > couple of SUV's > > > came > > > > out ahead of popular cars ... > > > > > > > > So I think it's all pretty relative and comes down again > > to the fact > > > > people really shouldn't generalize, as some SUV owners try > > > to own the > > > > best one for the environment while still getting the > > > vehicle they want > > > > and enjoy, while some car owners don't realize that an SUV > > > does better > > > > on the road then their car. > > > > > > > > Now there's no reasoning for the Lincon Navigator people > > other than > > > they > > > > have the money to waste I suppose ... But others should be > > > given a bit > > > > more slack since their SUV only does 1 mpg less than the popular > > > > minivans. That's hardly something to crucify over ... But > > > then again, > > > > what do I know. > > > > > > > > Interesting stuff. Of course there's lots of great family > > > cars in this > > > > list that do great on mileage. > > > > (most of this is 2002 data) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
